"harryagain" wrote in message
...

"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Fredxxx wrote:
On 05/06/2015 18:16, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
The Natural Philosopher wrote:
Ah. Your usual trick of thinking just because there is 'socialist'
in a title it has anything to do with socialism.

Well that is I suppose reasonably true of the Labour party. Just
because it has labour in its name doesn't mean it knows anything
about work.

Suppose it's too much for you to know the history of the Labour party.

Not sure if the history is relevant, when labour of today bear no
resemblance to your historical Labour.

Tell Turnip that. He is the one obsessed with socialism - but doesn't
understand what it means.

Always associated with failure.

Must be why all those socialist obscenitys like public roads, government
education, the military, the cops, other infrastructure like airports,
ports,
the NHS etc etc etc have been such a dismal failure.

That's all you need to know.

You wouldn’t know what socialism was if it bit you on your lard arse.