On 05/06/2015 18:16, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
The Natural Philosopher wrote:
Ah. Your usual trick of thinking just because there is 'socialist' in a
title it has anything to do with socialism.

Well that is I suppose reasonably true of the Labour party. Just because
it has labour in its name doesn't mean it knows anything about work.

Suppose it's too much for you to know the history of the Labour party.

Not sure if the history is relevant, when labour of today bear no
resemblance to your historical Labour.

Was Tony Bliar a socialist?