Thread: cutting wires
View Single Post
  #47   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
The Natural Philosopher[_2_] The Natural Philosopher[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 39,563
Default cutting wires

On 27/05/15 10:53, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
charles wrote:
In article . com,
dennis@home wrote:
On 26/05/2015 23:05, wrote:



bad connection. Radials suffer much worse from them than rings.


A ring has more connections so a bad one is more likely.
The effects are different.


and if there is a break in a radial circuit it is very obvious. Not so
in a ring.


A break in the earth circuit in a radial is going to be obvious? Maybe
only when it kills you.


Rings were good before RCDs because fundamentally most
faults-live-to-case - and we had metal cases then - gave a blown fuse.

RCDS will trip on faults to earth no matter how generated: there is less
requirement for a absolutely guqaranteed earth


The ECC is the thinnest wire so most likely to break.


Questionable logic. Which breaks more easily? - a human hair or a matchstick

With a ring there
are two. Unlike a radial.


Finally, a Fact.




--
New Socialism consists essentially in being seen to have your heart in
the right place whilst your head is in the clouds and your hand is in
someone else's pocket.