View Single Post
  #53   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
whisky-dave[_2_] whisky-dave[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,204
Default OT - none of the above

On Wednesday, 6 May 2015 10:19:18 UTC+1, Simon Brown wrote:
"whisky-dave" wrote in message
...
On Tuesday, 5 May 2015 23:41:41 UTC+1, Simon Brown wrote:
"whisky-dave" wrote in message
...

Russia won't attack with nuclear, it doesn't need to with such a
nuclear
deterent.
They'll go through the Ukrain into parts or Europe and from their set
up
convental
weapons, making sure they don;t use nuclear, unless nuclear is used
against them.

So Trident is completely pointless and always has been.


Yep, just as usless as the American and russian nuclear deterents.


Nope, those have much more than just one sub at sea at any one time.


But still as useless, unless they use them, isn't that the case. If they aren't used and won't be used they are useless.