"Broadback" wrote in message
...
On 05/05/2015 12:27, Rod Speed wrote:


"Broadback" wrote in message
...
On 05/05/2015 11:46, Rod Speed wrote:


"Broadback" wrote in message
...
On 05/05/2015 09:30, Rod Speed wrote:
Brian Gaff wrote

Cos they want to flog them to make some much needed dosh?

Unlikely anyone will actually be stupid enough to buy them.

"harryagain" wrote in message
...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-message-field




Now why are the Russians coming up with a new tank at this time I
wonder?



In that case why is it described as an armoured troop carrier?

It isn't. You don’t have a gun like that on an armoured troop carrier.

That is something completely different to the T-14

The why is the picture titled:-
Showing off: Kurganets-25 Armored Personnel Carrier will go on display
at Saturday's parade

Pity about all the other pictures before it labelled T-14 tank.

What exactly am I missing?

Everything, as always.

How do *you* differentiate between a tank and a armoured personnel
carrier?

A main battle tank has a ****ing great gun that sticks out quite a bit in
front of it.

A self propelled howitzer has a quite different gun and is still nothing
like an APC gun wise.