"harryagain" wrote in message
...

"Tim Streater" wrote in message
.. .
In article , harryagain
wrote:

"Tim w" wrote in message
...
On 28/04/2015 20:52, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 28/04/15 19:46, alan_m wrote:
On 28/04/2015 17:24, Capitol wrote:


It looks like snake oil. The efficiency of the process is not
mentioned. What is the cost per litre of production?


And how much energy is required in the production? I also suspect
that
the "direct air capture" is a heavily subsidised processes looking
for a
market for the output.

Its just more technobollox trying to keep the green wet dream alive.

Like all green****e, its technically possible and commercially
catastrophic.

People like you with no vision, no faith and no hope for the future are
living walking tragedies. If I was king I would have you all put socks
in your mouths so that the rest of us didn't have to hear the constant,
dismal, negative, droning.

He's just a poor old man, living in the past and can't see past the end
of his nose.

I bet his grandad thought you'd die if you travelled faster than 30mph.

He was born in 1843 so that might not have been a too-surprising
attitude.

But if so, he was wrong.
New thinking is needed.
Not drivel from the past.

The age of cheap fossil fuel is almost over.

Not with coal and gas.

We must use what remains as sparingly as possible to set us on the new
renewable technology.

We should be using nukes.

Which age need never be over.
And won't poison us or our children.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diesel_exhaust
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_pol...Health_effects

Nukes don’t produce any of that.