On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 21:49:09 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:
"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 21:31:09 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:
"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 08:21:14 +0100, News
wrote:
In message , Tough Guy no. 1265
writes
On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 23:27:48 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:
Someone with Alzheimer's, someone with peripheral nerve
damage that hasn't noticed that their feet don't have any
temperature sensing anymore.
All of who would be looked after by someone else
But not full time, as in 24 hours, every single day. My Mum is almost
91, lives in a warden assisted flat, and has a carer for half an hour
every day, plus visits from my brother, and SIL. She is not suffering
from full blown Alzheimers yet, but her memory is iffy. Deciding to
run
a bath whilst alone is typical of something she just may decide to do,
on a whim. Moving her to a care home would make little difference, as
there would still not be a person with her, at all times.
Why should the other 99.9% of the population have a mixer tap and not
just
the few that need it? What next, every house must have a stairlift?
It isn't a few that need it with little kids.
Yes, little kids should be supervised when having a bath
so they don't drown etc, but it would be quite convenient
to be able to have any of the other kids able to just turn
the tap on to fill the bath at temp that wont scald.
Yes, that should be voluntary rather than mandatory by govt.
Kids aren't stupid.
They can be a lot less careful than adults and plenty of
them don't realise you can kill a little kid if you scald it.
They move out of the way if it's too hot. You'd have to hold them in the bath forcefully to kill them.
They'll remove themselves from hot water.
Not even possible with the youngest babys.
They don't run their own baths.
If it was too hot, I'd remove it and add cold.
The youngest kids can't even turn the tap, stupid.
Then they wouldn't have turned the hot either.
--
Loose or missing nuts. Spank the monkey (Y/N)?