On 17/04/15 17:24, Nightjar "cpb"@ wrote:
On 17/04/2015 15:51, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 17/04/15 13:28, Nightjar "cpb"@ wrote:
On 17/04/2015 12:34, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 17/04/15 11:09, Nightjar "cpb"@ wrote:
On 17/04/2015 10:32, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
...
You might think that would be to your advantage. I differ. I'd rather
have a UKIP led democracy.

I see strong parallels between the rise of UKIP and the rise of the
National Socialist German Workers' Party, so I'll pass on that option.


Actually the SNP is the Nazi party - they are after all National
Socialists.

And Germany is nearer a Third Reich - or a Fourth Reich - than at any
time since 1943..

You're looking in the wrong place for the danger..

Look at Stalin, and Lenin for your models,

Let me see... A far right wing party with a charismatic leader, who
blames all the country's ills on a combination of foreign countries
implementing an unfair treaty and a particular group of people, and who
offers populist solutions to the problems. No, I was right first time.


You would be if the above was in any sense true.

You may have read it on the Guardian but that doesn't make it true.
There I've stabbed your sacred cow

So what do you disagree with?

Nigel is not charismatic?
UKIP is not far right.

UKIP doesn't blame the EU for our problems?
Not totally no.

They don't think immigrants need to be controlled?

No, they think immigration needs to be controlled.

UKIP policies are not intended to appeal to the masses?

No, they are intended to solve the nations problems. That they also
appeal to the people who support them shows that there is some hope.




--
Everything you read in newspapers is absolutely true, except for the
rare story of which you happen to have first-hand knowledge. €“ Erwin Knoll