View Single Post
  #7   Report Post  
Ryan Kremser
 
Posts: n/a
Default computer interface help with at least 29 output ports

is there an easy way to add maybe 136 more address easily, previously i was
looking into using a led counter to accept a pulse to incriment the value
but now that i'm looking it seems to be a bit more expensive than i was
hoping. I need to be able to drive 6 - 3 digit (7 segment) displays. plus
an extra 10 could make another aspect a bit easier. Would it actully be a
good idea to use these outputs to control the led's or even with the
difference in price would the counters be a better solution?

"petrus bitbyter" wrote in message
. ..
Ryan,

A very thorough treatment of the parallel port interface you will find :
http://www.beyondlogic.org/

If you read the EPP part you will find out that for output only, you can

use
the method of address- and data register also with a standard parallel
printer port. So with five (LS)374 (*not 473*) you can have 32 outputs.

Some
Googling and you'll find the datasheet.

For low voltages (15V) and low currents (0.5A) a solid state relay will

be
overkill. A small (reed) relay will do. Farnell sells HE221A0590 from
Breed/Hamlin priced about 3 euro. FAIK it's one of the cheapest. This

relay
will need only a 15mA at 5V so with all outputs on, you still require only
about 0.5A. You'd better not use this relay to switch the mains unless

you
want to start fireworks.

The outputs of the 374 cannot source the 15mA required so you have to use

a
transistor or an open collector/drain buffer p.e. a HC07. Keep in mind

that
a transistor will invert the logic. Always place a diode parallel to the
relay coil.

pieter

"Ryan Kremser" schreef in bericht
s.com...
actually solid state would probably be a better solution for me, for the
most part all i'll be switching is 5 or 12 volt lines. If you could
point me to some more information with the printer port it would help me
out a lot, so far this seems to be the best option. I was actually
planning on running this through dos, complied used c++ as there will be
no monitor on the system and it will require fast boot and response
times. Any better alternatives to dos or will i still be able to access
the parallel port in the same way. again thanks in advance

petrus bitbyter wrote:
Ryan,

You can use an EPP (printer) port. This way you can use a separate

address-
and databyte. Using a 374 type of address register you can enable or

disable
up to eight 473 type data registers without address decoding. That

gives
you
256 output pins which sure will be enough.

Do you really need relays to switch your equipment? They tend to be

pretty
expensive and need a good amount of current. So for twentynine relays

you
may end up to need some 3A of current. If you want to switch the

mains,
solid state relais are a better choice. (Although they are not cheap
either.) You can also use triacs and optocouplers but you will need

some
extra parts so you're building your own solid state relais this way.

Except from the hardware you'll also need some software. Newer (NT

based)
Windows versions will not allow you to write directly to the output

ports.
One of the methods to circumvent these problem is using a special

driver.
For instance:
http://www.paraport.net/

pieter




---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.515 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 2-9-2003