On Sat, 7 Mar 2015 17:45:02 -0800 (PST), trader_4
wrote:
On Saturday, March 7, 2015 at 7:15:04 PM UTC-5, Shadow wrote:
On Sat, 7 Mar 2015 15:12:25 -0800 (PST), trader_4
wrote:
On Saturday, March 7, 2015 at 12:16:24 PM UTC-5, Shadow wrote:
On Sat, 7 Mar 2015 06:27:05 -0800 (PST), trader_4
wrote:
You don't have to worry about the Patriot act. Being Brazil, and
not a prime target, you can just ignore muslim terrorism and let
the major countries of the world deal with the problem. Convenient
for you. For the record, the Patriot Act passed with overwhelming
bipartisan support.
http://www.majorgeeks.com/news/file/...eeinternet.jpg
We don't get those shops here. I envy you.
[]'s
It's not even a good cartoon. No one is regulating internet speech here.
Do you get your news from cartoons?
I'm sorry, I thought you lived in America. You know - no fly
lists for comments in emails,
Yeah, you could wind up on the no fly list if you're chatting
it up with emails to terrorists.
Gotta laugh. If you are chatting with "terrorists", they take
you away in the middle of the night. The no-fly list is mainly for
journalists, people working with encryption, and peaceful anti
"Treason-Act" activists. And those that oppose illegal acts by the
government, and actually have the courage to discuss it over the phone
or by email.
We do have to take precautions
against the Jihadi John types you know.
He was a British mercenary working with the CIA. Is ALL your
news censored now ?
If you want to consort
with radical imams, terrorists, those who fund and support terrorists,
terrorist sympathizers, then I guess you'll just have to drive.
30% of people scared of discussing
politics over the phone, that sort of stuff.
I don't know where that alleged statistic came from.
"Wired" or "The Register". Google it. The words were
"uncomfortable" of discussing politics. No one in a free country
should be uncomfortable discussing ANYTHING legal, because of fear
they might be overheard by "Big Brother".
But since you are Russian, the cartoon will make no sense at
all. I only understood it because our dictators said that they took
our freedom because of "terrorists". The dictatorship lasted 38 years,
and we recently discovered there were no terrorists, it was all a
ploy.
And here I thought we were talking about legalizing drugs....
Gee, maybe instead of worrying about what's allegedly going on in
the USA, where you don't live, you should take a look at what's
going on in your own country:
http://www.cnn.com/2014/05/09/world/...ine-world-cup/
Brazil wrestles with crack epidemic as it gears up for World Cup
Terrible. The federal police just caught a gang which shipped
a total of 15000 kilos of cocaine into Europe. The DEA appeared, all
charges were dropped, everyone was released and the helicopter and the
drugs were returned. Thanks DEA. There's even a video on youtube of
the apprehension of a lot of 500Kg, if you want it, I can post it here
if some secret court has not issued a take-down notice.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...capital-brazil
Cracolndia: the crack capital of Brazil where addicts are forced to seek help
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz3TkpHP5t4
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
" Inside Brazil's hellish shantytown streets: Crack cocaine skid row where users steal, prostitute themselves, and pick through the trash to get their next fix
Brazil today is the world's largest consumer of both cocaine and its crack derivative, according to the Federal University of Sao Paolo"
I said a few messages back, crack is not cannabis. It's more
like alcohol, people that use it can get very violent, and those that
abuse it invariably wreck their families. Rather like anti-cannabis
laws, they can be extraordinarily destructive.
Sounds like your kinder, gentler approach to legalizing drugs ain't working
so well down there. Yet, here you are, lecturing us about the USA that
you know nothing about. Good grief.
http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03...Lei/L11343.htm
The law signed by Lula in 2006 makes possession of small
quantities of drugs by consumers a minor crime, but it fails in that
it does not distinguish light drugs from heavy drugs(like crack and
alcohol). Penalty is a fine and up to 10 months community service.
The previous law had a mandatory minimum 2 year jail sentence
for the possession of even half a gram of marijuana and was passed
under supervision of the Americans during our military dictatorship.
It's a pity Lula was not advised better when he bundled all
drugs under the same law. It's like making a .22 rifle and a nuclear
weapon equally illegal.
BTW the country that legalized cannabis was Uruguay, not
Brazil. There is no "gentle","kind"approach here. You remain in jail
until a judge decides if you are trafficking, or are just a consumer.
Trafficking can get you 15 years in a Brazilian jail. If the DEA does
not let you out.
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012