krw wrote:
On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 21:39:38 -0400, Bill
wrote:

krw wrote:
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 22:26:29 -0400, Bill
wrote:

Richard wrote:
On 4/16/2015 7:03 PM, Bill wrote:
Richard wrote:
On 4/16/2015 5:08 PM, Bill wrote:
Lew Hodgett wrote:
The point is that the customer shared the wealth of cost reductions.
Lew
Was a change of sentiment required to help achieve 8-digit CEO
salaries?
It seems like things may no longer be running in accordance with "the
book" you mentioned.
Internet technology at our fingertips, such as is facilitating our
conversation, might be an exception.

Bill
Not true, Bill.

Check out the incentives paid on Wall street to productive traders.


Productive traders, sometimes, are a little like a parasite --like
lawyers.


So are some posters...
Didn't wish to offend. It's just that they contribute as much as Poker
players -- Zero sum game.
...except that it's not.
Maybe not "exactly", but (hopefully) you get my point. Or even better,
let's just drop it. I don't wish to offend any full time traders or
lawyers.
No, I really don't get your point but it sounds like cluelessness to
me.

That's me! Clueless... lol %-)


But it seems like the easiest way to trade is to get into congress,
where you are allowed to trade on inside information (I find this
repugnant). I'll stand up against that if you like.
I'll stand with you on that one but it is a very different situation.


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com