On Mon, 09 Mar 2015 18:58:30 -0700, Jonathan D. Ball, the other JB
(JB2) tried to bluster his way through
with the following::

snip

"Because Wilson did not act with the requisite criminal intent, it
cannot be proven beyond reasonable doubt to a jury that he violated 18
U.S.C.§ 242 when he fired his weapon at Brown."

And so on. The DoJ decided, rightly, from reading the report, that the
case shouild not be prosecuted. Their language in analyzing the
tertimony concluded, in many cases, what they thought a jury would
likely find credible. They didn't conclude that Wilson was innocent,
"in effect" or in fact. That's not what prosecutors do.

Now, go get yourself all bent out of shape into another foul-mouthed
snit, you bottom-feeding, name-forging troll.

--
Ed Huntress

Shabazz Holder said Wilson is innocent.

'You need glasses, Ball? Are you having trouble reading these days?

Holder said no such thing. Now go back to your kook NGs, Ball, where
you belong, you low-life troll.

--
Ed Huntress