On 2/19/2015 4:47 PM, Ed Huntress wrote:
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 15:59:01 -0800, Rudy Canoza
wrote:

On 2/19/2015 3:48 PM, Ed Huntress wrote:
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 15:39:30 -0800, Rudy Canoza
wrote:

On 2/19/2015 3:36 PM, Ed Huntress wrote:
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 15:06:32 -0800, Rudy Canoza
wrote:

On 2/19/2015 2:56 PM, Ed Huntress wrote:
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:09:32 -0800, Rudy Canoza
wrote:

On 2/19/2015 1:04 PM, Ed Huntress wrote:
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 12:42:46 -0800, Rudy Canoza
wrote:

On 2/19/2015 4:40 AM, Ed Huntress wrote:
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 07:21:31 -0500, Stormin Mormon
wrote:

On 2/18/2015 11:29 PM, Martin Eastburn wrote:
On 2/18/2015 4:35 PM, Ed Huntress wrote:

We do know Brown was a thug from the store video and all the physical
evidence in the shooting indicates he should have been shot.

The physical evidence consists of a bunch of bullet holes. You mean
the testimony.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_47KVJV8DU

I don't chase videos. Tell me what it is, and maybe I'll look.

Meantime, the fact remains: there is no physical evidence except for
bullet holes, some empty brass, and a dead kid.

And a beat up police man.


The store video is, of course, some evidence.

Evidence of what, Chris? That Brown was a thug? No question.

Now, how does that translate into "evidence" that the cop was
justified in shooting him when he was 20 feet or so away from the car?


His distance from the car is irrelevant, you stupid ham hock. It's the
distance from the cop, and he was much closer to the cop than 20 feet.

You're not paying attention. Chris suggested

No one named "Chris" in this thread.

Who do you think "Stormin' Mormon" is?



Wake up, Ball.

No one by that name either, Diana. You really shouldn't rely on
McDumpster for anything. He only got it from some ****wit who calls
itself "Hurtlin' Squirty", and none of you knows your ass from your face.

Give it up, jackass. I didn't get anything from George. I just
followed this link:

http://www.google.com/search?q=usene...+jonathan+ball

You *did* get it from McDumpster, liar.

Hey, you lying jackass, I don't remember ever seeing anything from
George about your real name.

Bull****. You first started with this **** after McDumpster claimed to
know who I am. You didn't know where to go *find* that stupid
link-to-nowhere until after he posted the same stupid wrong ****.

You don't know what you're talking about, Diana. Neither does McDumpster.

You are so lazy, you won't even click on a link that was about you.

I clicked on the link. It's not about me. It's about some Usenet
****tards - your kind of people - who think they're sleuths. They're
goofs, not sleuths. That's why they're your kind of people, Diana.

You seem to be especially upset about being outed this time, Ball.

I haven't been "outed", Diana. You, dougie, McDumpster and your fellow
****wits don't know what you're bull****ting about.


--

I ceased in the year 1764 to believe that one can convince one’s
opponents with arguments printed in books. It is not to do that,
therefore, that I have taken up my pen, but merely so as to annoy them,
and to bestow strength and courage on those on our own side, and to make
it known to the others that they have not convinced us.

Georg Christoph Lichtenberg
1742 - 1799