On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 02:28:36 -0400, Tom Gardner
wrote:

On 9/26/2014 2:10 PM, Ed Huntress wrote:
On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 23:21:27 -0400, Tom Gardner
wrote:

On 9/25/2014 10:34 PM, Ed Huntress wrote:

When it comes to science, it's mostly true. And it's so seldom *not*
true, that those rare cases become legends.



I might agree if you agree that if there were not *ANY* Money to be made
from global warming it simply wouldn't exist.

Whether you agree or not has nothing to do with whether it's true,
Tom. What I said above is true no matter what you think.

As for money, there's plenty to be made on both sides. The coal
industry, the oil industry, conservative think tanks, and
opportunistic book authors have made or spent bundles on climate
denial.



How many 15 year stints of no warming will it take?

For what?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming_hiatus

How many more times
must AGW proponents be caught fudging data?

The deniers do it all the time, Tom.

You seem to think you know the answer, that a very large majority of
the world's climatologists are lying, and that you, Tom Gardner, know
enough about it to see through their deceit -- even if you couldn't
even read one of their white papers to save your life.

You're a True Believer, Tom.

Just how much **** does it
take to spoil the ice cream?

You should be asking that of the denier/conspiracy theorists. It
doesn't seem to matter how many time their "facts" get shot down. They
just keep slinging more of it.

--
Ed Huntress