View Single Post
  #14   Report Post  
George
 
Posts: n/a
Default If you'd really like to know (very long)

The irritant scarring caused by inorganics, and the adsorption and release
of metal and other contaminants by (charcoal) particulates are not analogs
for wood, any more than volatile organics in tobacco smoke.

Seems pretty clear.

"Ken Moon" wrote in message
link.net...
Hi,
Although Lyn's message below seem to target metallic irritants, the
association with woodturning comes from the microscopic particles

generated
with the sanding operations. The PM 2.5 regulations, if they are ever
enacted in this country will help in the public and industrial areas, but

it
is up to individuals to take care of themselves. The effects of ultra

small
particles are shown in the illnesses of silicosis (white lung, found in
workes around crushed stone and quarries), black lung found in coal miners
and the thousands who die of lung cancer every year from smoking. These
smallest particles go so much deeper into the minute air passages that

they
can not be expelled by normal breathing or coughing. So they remain there,
carcinogenic or not, blocking all areas past where they stop, blocking air
that would normally be absorbed into the blood stream. Even if they are

not
carcinogenic, they cause significant damage.
It's up to each of us to learn to take care of ourselves.