On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 09:27:52 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Thursday, September 25, 2014 12:07:26 PM UTC-4, Ed Huntress wrote:
On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 08:35:00 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer

wrote:



On Thursday, September 25, 2014 6:07:37 AM UTC-7, wrote:

On Thursday, September 25, 2014 12:44:18 AM UTC-4, jon_banquer wrote:



On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 9:07:00 PM UTC-7, Ignoramus31447 wrote:







On 2014-09-24, Ed Huntress wrote:







On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 10:50:12 -0500, Ignoramus31447







wrote:







On 2014-09-24, Ed Huntress wrote:







Ta-ta, Jon. Stay out of jail now, ya' hear?







I did not know that Jon Banquer was in jail. What happened?







Jon was booked for battery - domestic violence. Apparently his wife







didn't press charges, so he probably didn't spend any real time in







jail:







http://mugshots.com/US-Counties/Flor...r.2770726.html







Here's a further rundown by one of Jon's old buddies, Tim Markoski. I







never tried to check the facts, but FWIW:







http://tinyurl.com/nh5uvou







Pretty disgusting, I would say.







It has got to suck that neither of you two idiots can



find a felony conviction and the best you can do is come



up with a mug shot. Here is another "disgusting" mug shot:







http://img.auctiva.com/imgdata/1/7/3...41295588_o.jpg







And be sure to remind the judges, prosecutors and investigators that your good name is to be restored if there are no convictions.







Otherwise, tell then that you reserve the right AT ANY TIME to follow their public, private or personal contacts and raise this courtroom conduct of theirs then and afterwards regarding your innocence as much as is needed until your name and rep is restored.







I don't know a lot about San Diego or that part of the southwest between there and Arizona, and I sure don't know how in the living hell San Diego business and government leaders have come to view how far-right wing governments (like their own) commonly form throughout Western Civilization. My experience with far-rightwing governments is that the judges and prosecutors side with how the business community feels. Rightists use state resources and investigators to target leftist political opponents, not always to deter normal crime.







Jon, I think there is much less of a fantasy world like all that in Berkeley, San Francisco and Palo Alto and the Silicon Valley area. Its friendlier there and the statistics generally have much more meaning.



The only thing employers at machine shops care about are felony convictions. I've never had one. Nobody gives a **** about a mug shot or an arrest. The only people who care are idiots who think they can use an arrest to show I have no credibility. It fails every time.



A note to both of you idiots: If Jon's Florida case was dismissed or

if he was acquitted, his arrest record would have been expunged

immediately upon request.



In Florida, most misdemeanors can be expunged, if you don't have

another conviction. An exception is battery -- domestic violence.



But that only applies if you were convicted.



So you figure it out. There would be no public record if Jon wasn't

convicted, so mog., your amateurish suggestions about threatening

judges, etc., are nonsense.

Ed, no one mentioned anything about threatening a judge.

Sure you did. You said "... tell then that you reserve the right AT
ANY TIME to follow their public, private or personal contacts and
raise this courtroom conduct of theirs then and afterwards..."

So you're going to follow their "public, private, or personal
contacts..." and thats not a veiled threat?

All I said was that court room officers and investigators' conduct can be raised at any future time, regardless of a court judgement - as it has been done legally.

I didn't say you were threatening their *life*. I just said that your
threats were nonsense.


Now Ed, are you saying that it can't ??

Before you dig yourself a hole on hypotheticals and speculation, let
me just clarify for you that the case was nolle prossed on June 12,
2000. It wasn't dismissed. Jon wasn't acquitted. A prosecutor in a
domestic violence case typically invokes nolle prosequi when the other
party drops charges.

The case is still "active" in the sense that the prosecutor can
re-prosecute. That often occurs when the party who brought the initial
charges changes (her) mind and decides to press charges after all, or
if the accused does it again. In this case, the statute of limitations
would require that he beat his wife again.

If the case went as Jon claimed, the prosecutor would not have nolle
prossed the case. He would have dismissed the charges.

So your instructions to Jon about warning the judge are nonsense. His
arrest record was not expunged. That's why it's online now. Jon
*could* have had it expunged at the time if the charges were
dismissed. It would have cost him nothing. In Florida, it's automatic.

--
Ed Huntress