On 28/07/2014 08:16, harryagain wrote:
"Nightjar "cpb"@" "insert my surname here wrote in message
...
On 27/07/2014 22:24, newshound wrote:
On 27/07/2014 21:40, wrote:
Nightjar wrote:
AC for simple long-distance transmission...
Except for underwater cables, where it can cause unacceptable
transmission losses.

How does immersing a 11kV AC cable in water increase transmission
losses? This isn't a joke question, I can't see how the medium
surrounding a cable changes the action of the cable itself, other
than cooling effects.

jgh

It's losses in the dielectric, so it applies to underground cables too.
Dielectric losses in air are low.

Like the man says, although the problem is significantly greater under
water. 30km is about the limit for AC transmission under water, which is
why our links to the continent are HVDC. Even then, the cables are very
specialised and there are IIRC only three manufacturers of HVDC underwater
cables in the world. That is a limiting factor on how many offshore wind
farms can be built, as they need HVDC underwater cable, the manufacturers
have a limited capacity and well filled order books, while increasing
capacity is not something that can be done overnight.


Our main link to Europe is not underwater, it is via the channel tunnel.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/bu...l-2289665.html


That is a quarter of the capacity of the Sellindge to Les Mandarins
underwater link and they were still only talking about it in April this
year.

--
Colin Bignell