On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 20:35:18 -0400, Jim Wilkins wrote:

"Tim Wescott" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 12 Jun 2014 15:22:19 -0400, Jim Wilkins wrote:


Despite close competition Tim gets this week's prize for most hostile
response to a civil reply.

It certainly wasn't intended to be. I was under the impression I was
being factual and helpful.

Given the multiple nasty-grams back from the OP, however, NOW I'm
hostile.

--
Tim Wescott

He asked a question, you gave a civil reply to which he responded with
hostility. Is that clearer?

Sorry if my sentence structures are convoluted or ambiguous, they make
sense to me when I write them. The first drafts are -much- worse. -jsw

I do a considerable amount of writing in my professional career. It
doesn't matter how clear you are, _someone_ will misunderstand. And it
doesn't matter how clear you _think_ you are, every once in a while
you'll get it entirely wrong.

--
Tim Wescott
Control system and signal processing consulting
www.wescottdesign.com