trader_4 wrote:
On Friday, May 30, 2014 11:16:59 AM UTC-4, Oren wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2014 05:26:25 +0200, nestork

wrote:



And this analogy has nothing to do with responsible gun
ownership.
Guns

are safe when they're in responsible hands. It's when
the gun falls

into the wrong hands and innocent people are killed for
no reason
that

the public demands that something be done. That's
because it's at
those

times that people realize that one person's right to
life trumps 100

people's right to own a gun.



Nestor,



Same emotional argument could be made to take away other
constitutional
rights. How many criminals have killed, where you could
say
had the police been able to search without a warrant, hold
without
charging, interrogate without a lawyer, use major evidence
at trial
that was
ruled inadmissible, that next killing would not have
happened?

Or how about looking at it from another perspective.
One's right to
life trumps 100 nut cases walking the streets, so anyone
who mentally
ill and could possibly be a threat should be locked up.
Of course the
usual libs that have issues with guns, are the ones
championing all
the above "rights".



Exactly, take the rights away from the sane people, but
don't put any restrictiond on the crazy ones
Typical lib speak