On 4/26/2014 5:33 PM, jim wrote:
....

Consumer sentiment is they will put whatever works and whatever is
cheapest in their. In spite mountains of propaganda against ethanol
almost everybody puts it in their tank. The look at the price
and that is all.

Basically there is no alternative.


People currently by E10 because that's what is on the market.

No they were initially given a choice.Consumers looked at the price
and bought the ethanol blend. That is how ethanol sales grew much faster
than the mandates for all those years.

No they weren't except for the transition period between the time of
leaded and unleaded when vehicles weren't ethanol-ready. Once that
transition period was over, the option went away for all intents and
purposes.

Stations mostly dropped the non-ethanol simply to not have to keep the
two alternatives separate.

Just as there's only the one or two E85 pumps in town, there's only one
station w/ no ethanol.


It is on
the market owing to the removal of the two former alternative additives
and there's nothing at least as yet that does the same job as cheaply.

There never were any former alternatives. There were two deadly toxins
that never should have been allowed to be sold in the first place.
....

Your opinion of them notwithstanding, they were there and on the market
for some 75-80 years. That pretty much means there were alternatives.

Anyway, you've an opinion; I've an opinion that differs. I'm marking
the thread to ignore so I won't be tempted to prolong it any longer...

--