On 16/04/14 10:54, Tim Watts wrote:
On 16/04/14 10:37, Jethro_uk wrote:
On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 08:31:33 +0100, Tim Watts wrote:

On 16/04/14 07:02, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 23:18:51 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:

...and here, already? Do you REALLY think Farage and his people would
be, could be LESS competent than Clegg, Milband, Cameron?

Farage and WHAT people? We do not have a clue who they all are. Farage
only ever appears alone. The other UKIPpers are mostly invisible. Only
Nuttall pops up occasionally. If Bloom hadn't been kicked out, then he
would have become a major contender for a seat in government were
Farage to win power. And what office of state would Bloom have
occupied, do you think? Minister for Gender Equality, perhaps?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Helmer for a start - if you read his
energy policy for UKIP it makes far more sense than anything any of the
main parties are doing (hint greenwash out, nuclear in, sod the CO2 in
the meantime to ensure stable supply).

Well, that's my vote sorted.


OK - you'd probably better read it then instead of taking my word

http://www.ukipmeps.org/uploads/file...-lights-on.pdf

It's quite readable and only 17 pages.

That's one criticism I have of UKIP - their website sucks - links
disappear and stuff like this is not on there...

Tell me about it. I think the last IT guy was working for the Tory party.

Well they have, but its not a lot better either.

I told em the site sucked and would never work and was insecure as hell
and they needed to start again. But who am I? I didn't offer to charge
em 100k a year to fix it, so they didn't listen.

Sigh. Around Nigel, are some good people, lower down, I am afraid there
are some career committee types who just dont belong...

The standard trick is to increase the workload, and then offer to 'help
out' by reducing their responsibilities, before ,moving them sideways..







--
Ineptocracy

(in-ep-toc-ra-cy) €“ a system of government where the least capable to
lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the
members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are
rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a
diminishing number of producers.