On Sun, 13 Apr 2014 21:48:49 -0700 (PDT), Harry K
wrote:

The seizue was legal and constitutional.

Yes. A few things have since come to light. BLM Director Neil Kornze,
from Nevada, was for former worker for Sen. Harry Reid. There may be
some cronyism going on. Some here speculate the Chinese companies may
want areas for solar farms or other want water and mineral right on
the land. Who knows, but is stinks to high heaven.

Bottom line: Bundy is still a thief no matter how you try to dress it up.

Turns out Bundy is a real dumb ass. He never had a lawyer in the
first court appearance (98?) and tried to represent himself (fool for
a client). Therefore, the case was not appealed in the 9th Circuit
Court of Appeals (dumb)

The local paper is not exactly a bastion of conservatism - but.

EDITORIAL: Washington, the Bundy ranch and our rights

http://www.reviewjournal.com/opinion/editorial-washington-bundy-ranch-and-our-rights

Court ruling July 2013:

http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/species/reptiles/desert_tortoise/pdfs/Order_US_v__Bundy_7_9_13.pdf

Court ruling October 2013:

http://www.blm.gov/pgdata/etc/medialib/blm/nv/field_offices/las_vegas_field_office/cattle_trespass.Par.40211.File.dat/Dkt%2056%20Order%20Granting%20Motion%20to%20Enforc e%2010-9-13.pdf