nospam wrote:

In article , Michael A.
Terrell wrote:

only 7% had a major problem. that's very low, just as i said.

7% is totally unacceptable. .7% is ridiculous and .07% is still too
high. On the other hand, some people would defend a burning bag of dog
**** as top quality and flawless.

troll.


Moron.


first of all, no product has a 0.07% failure rate. that's just not
realistic.


Disprove it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_Sigma


--
Anyone wanting to run for any political office in the US should have to
have a DD214, and a honorable discharge.