On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:02:47 -0500, Kurt Ullman
wrote:

She tried to sell the jury on 1st degree murder and that muddied the
water on the first shot. The jury agreed that continuing to shoot
after the threat was gone was a crime.

They are talking about refiling the 1st degree charge. Since he was
already convicted, how is that not double jeopardy?

Good question. Does a hung jury prevent another bite at the apple vs
a not guilty verdict, which would be double jeopardy.

Feds could come with a civil rights violation, which would not be
double jeopardy as it would be a court of a different jurisdiction.

If the verdict was not guilty, yes it would be double jeopardy in the
same jurisdiction. IME.