On Sun, 9 Feb 2014 06:18:46 -0800 (PST), "
wrote:

They're all misleading here. Fox says the $250K appears to have been
a "fair" price. On what basis? The state says they aren't asking for
their money back, but they are suing the owner for exactly that.
Interesting case. IDK how the laws and case law work on something like
this.

Contract law? A "meeting of the minds" at sale. My guess.