DIYbanter - View Single Post - Despairing of EVER getting a coherent ethical justification forwealth redistribution

Rudy Canoza[_3_]

On 1/21/2014 5:17 PM, wrote:
On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 5:57:55 PM UTC-5, Rudy Canoza wrote:

Okay explain to me and the rest of the readers why posting about wealth distribution in a metal working group is ethical.

Why don't you ask that question of gummer, aka Mark Wieber (Dwieber)?

He regularly posts non-metalworking content here. So do a lot of other

people whose politics you like. So, your position seems to be that if

one is a "good ol' boy" who once posted some little bit of metalworking

content in r.c.m., and if you like the person's politics, then posting

off-topic material here is ethical, in your view; but if you dislike the

person's politics, or if the person has never posted any metalworking

content, then you see it as unethical. That is not a coherent ethical

position for you to take.

You are the one that said I was wrong. So you are the one I am asking about the ethics of posting off topic messages in RCM.

I'm pointing out that you have a disgusting double standard. When your
political buddies post off-topic material here, you don't complain.
That's hypocritical.