DIYbanter - View Single Post - Despairing of EVER getting a coherent ethical justification forwealth redistribution

Rudy Canoza[_3_]

On 1/21/2014 2:46 PM, wrote:
On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 5:34:45 PM UTC-5, Rudy Canoza wrote:

It is obvious to me that Rudy has no ethics. I can not think of any ethical reason that he has to post in a metalworking group. Bugster on the other hand does not post Off Topic stuff in RCM. Therefore I find that Bugster has ethics and Rudy has none. Good on Bugster. I declare him the winner of the arguments.

You're wrong, of course.

Okay explain to me and the rest of the readers why posting about wealth distribution in a metal working group is ethical.

Why don't you ask that question of gummer, aka Mark Wieber (Dwieber)?
He regularly posts non-metalworking content here. So do a lot of other
people whose politics you like. So, your position seems to be that if
one is a "good ol' boy" who once posted some little bit of metalworking
content in r.c.m., and if you like the person's politics, then posting
off-topic material here is ethical, in your view; but if you dislike the
person's politics, or if the person has never posted any metalworking
content, then you see it as unethical. That is not a coherent ethical
position for you to take.