"Charlie Self" wrote in message
...
randy responds:

SO WHAT?? That doesn't mean a damn thing, unless you know what it's a
percentage OF. And you don't.

Yabbut, the OP made similar claims. Jump him, too. Or, better yet, let
all
this
die, because it is essentially meaningless (because the statistic is
meaningless and mildly misleading and was probably intended to be so).

i did not make similiar claims. todd claimed the article was proof
re-enlistment was 'high'. i think ive made it pretty clear i wasnt
making
ANY claims except the % of their goal was falling and that the article
did
not provide proof of todd's claim.

And you're arguing continuously over a meaningless stat in a meaningless
manner. I hoped there would be some sense interjected here by someone,
but,
obviously, that hope is forlorn. The thread dies for me right now.

no, i am arguing that people are claiming i said something i didnt. if you
think im arguing anything else you have missed the point. but hey. you're
not alone.

randy