"Doug Miller" wrote in message
gy.com...
In article , "xrongor"
wrote:

"Dave Hinz" wrote in message
...
On 20 Jul 2004 12:31:39 GMT, Charlie Self
wrote:
Doug Miller respons:

because that is the only claim i made. the PERCENT is falling, not
actual
numbers.

SO WHAT?? That doesn't mean a damn thing, unless you know what it's a
percentage OF. And you don't.

yes i know it doesnt. ive tried for 10 posts to get you to admit that
the %
is falling. by saying 'so what' you appear to concede this point to me.
yes it is TOTALLY accurate to say the % is falling. and yes it is
TOTALLY
accurate to say you cannot draw any conclusions from that.

do you see?

What I *don't* see is why you keep repeating a figure that you now admit
is
without foundation for drawing any conclusions. If it's meaningless, why
do
you keep harping on it?

why do you guys keep harping on me for assigning meaning to it when i didnt?

randy