On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 21:03:13 -0600, Dean Hoffman
" wrote:

On 12/18/13 8:28 PM, Irreverent Maximus wrote:
On 12/18/2013 8:14 PM, wrote:


WTF are you talking about, kook?


My guess is that he is talking about a judge that ruled, a couple of
days ago, that the NSA is breaking the Constitutional rights of
American citizens (4th Amendment) by monitoring domestic communication
without a warrant.



But on the other hand a Texas court ruled warrants can be based on a
"prediction of a future crime".
Article he http://preview.tinyurl.com/l7pwjxc

That headline is *very* misleading. They were breaking the law. The
only issue I has with it is that they received the warrant *after* the
search. They're supposed to identify what they're looking for
(probably cause) *before* they search.