On Sun, 01 Dec 2013 21:01:23 -0700, Tony Hwang
wrote:

wrote:
On Sun, 01 Dec 2013 20:36:03 -0700, Tony Hwang
wrote:

wrote:
On Sun, 01 Dec 2013 18:30:46 -0700, Tony Hwang
wrote:

wrote:
On Sun, 01 Dec 2013 18:23:39 -0500, Fred McKenzie
wrote:

In article ,
Emma Genius wrote:

On 12/01/2013 10:43 AM, NotMe wrote:
I may try to patent the idea though I'll admit my 2-phase DC has a lot of
similarities with trader4's 2-phase AC.

A perfect analogy. DC is simply AC with a frequency of zero!

Depending on how you look at it, DC doesn't exist in the real world.
It's just a very low frequency AC. ;-)

Hi,
If I measure battery output with 'scope, I don't see any slightest sign
of wave form.

Then you have no clue what you're doing with an oscilloscope. I use
mine on "DC" signals daily.

Not even a noise. How come?

You're incompetent?

We have distinctively separate
DC and AC thpory. Ever heard of impedance in DC circuit?

Absolutely. You've never heard of a "Thevinin impedance"?

It is resistance only.

Wrong. It has an impedance. AT DC, it has only a real part but
again, DC doesn't exist in the real world.

If that is not the cae, we have to redo all the theories.

No, you just have to learn something. The theories are all cool with
reality.

Hmm,
Learn what without theory.

You flunked English (basic literacy), too, didn't you?

Experience alone does not cut it.

Don't make me laugh. What a *STUPID* statement.

You have to have both. Feels like I am back at school sitting in a
class room or lab.

You *obviously* need to be back there because you never learned even
the basics. ...'nother freakin' Cracker Jax engineer.

Do you know by any chance wwhol worked at Honeywell? Ask him about Fred
Miller award and gold tiger ring.

No, not this time either, stupid.