Thread: speaker phasing
View Single Post
  #8   Report Post  
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
Phil Allison[_2_] Phil Allison[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,716
Default speaker phasing


"dave"
Phil Allison wrote:
"dave the dickhead"
Phil Allison wrote:

"William Sommerwerck"

This is a common source of confusion. "Same direction" means "outward
or
inward", /not/ same direction viewed from overhead. The same signal
should
produce compression or rarefaction from all speakers.


** Correct.

Phasing similar speakers is all about making the low frequency output
from
each *reinforce* the others rather than cancel.

Compared to the wavelengths of low frequency sound, woofers are a point
(
hence omnidirectional ) source of sound pressure - so it is irrelevant
which way the cone faces.

Ideally, a listener should be seated at the same distance from each
speaker so all time ( of arrival ) delays are identical and do NOT
create phase
changes.




There is no such thing as correct time of arrival type of phase
coherence
in modern electronic media.


** WTF is meant by "modern electronic media " ??

Got nothing to do with my comments, what ever this idiot says.


Everything is close-miked and smeared together with "pan pots"


** Pan pots do not "smear" .


and any spatial sensation is created with DSP.


** Laughably stupid and wrong.


In real life, the stereo "sweet spot" has room for one person at a time.



** Correct.

Due to the criteria I just mentioned.

" Ideally, a listener should be seated at the same distance from each
speaker so all time ( of arrival ) delays are identical and do NOT create
phase
changes."


Do you work with roustabouts or what? Modern electronic media like Pop
Tunes and Rock tracks.


** So any popular music recording made in the last 50 years.


Yes Pan Pots suck, almost as bad as graphic equalizers.


** But do not smear - you ****ing nutter.


The sound stage can only be preserved by recording live ..


** Your hobby horse - not mine.



..... Phil