harryagain wrote:
"Matty F" wrote in message
...
On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 6:22:33 AM UTC+13, harry wrote:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/env...te-change.html
The majority of the statements in that article are simply lies. There is
just not enough time to refute the lies of those propagandists.
Oh and you're an expert?
"The IPCC has said this in the first of the three reports it intends
to release this year and next. Its attitude is unequivocal."
Well, it would be, wouldn't it. This is one mighty gravy train.
"The world is warming"
No it isn't
"sea levels are rising"
Are they?
"ice caps are shrinking"
Arctic sea ice has *increased* this summer
"there is more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere than at any time in
the past 800,000 years"
But only just up from the minimum and a very long way from the
maximum. CO2 release follows, not leads, increases in temperature. We
are still emerging from the last ice-age.
"and even the most optimistic computer model shows more of the same in
the near future"
I take it these are the same models that can't predict the past and
haven't predicted the present now being relied on to predict the
future?
"The IPCC says it is €ś95 per cent certain€ť €“ which
is the same as saying that the odds are 19 to one that the science
is right. Science is rarely surer of itself than this"
Based on what?
Some people will believe anything.
--
Terry Fields