On 29/10/13 14:13, Adrian wrote:
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 13:35:14 +0000, Andy Cap wrote:

I notice you omitted this bit...
snip

Sounds to me like standardisation might be a good plan...

What ever! It's all negated by a burgeoning population, all too often
encouraged through taxpayer-funded incentives. Of course immigration is
a considerable factor too. Green deals and bags-for-life is merely
tinkering while Rome burns.

Ah, the usual knee-jerk fallback position of the UKIP-hard-of-thinking
when faced with reality.

BTW, would your migration complaint be relating to intra-EU migration
(which doesn't affect the total EU population one tiny bit, of course),

But does involve transffering the least sucessful inhabitants of several
european countries from a place where their life is **** to do nothing
here, where life is infintelyt better on benefits, and their 12 kids
become not a horror of exoense, but a source of income?

sheesh, we have seen familes loading up shopping carts and walking
straight out of the supermearket without paying.

Straight into the car with E European plates and driving off.


legal external migration (which is already very strictly controlled)
or
illegal external migration (which is already... illegal)?

and unenforccable at OUR borders because of the requirement for free
passage beween european nations.

You can walk through a wood to get into the EU, once in its free passage
to the country of your choice.





--
Ineptocracy

(in-ep-toc-ra-cy) €“ a system of government where the least capable to
lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the
members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are
rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a
diminishing number of producers.