On 11/10/13 16:14, Fredxx wrote:
On 11/10/2013 08:50, Huge wrote:
On 2013-10-10, Fredxx wrote:
On 10/10/2013 23:56, The Natural Philosopher wrote:


If you want to dig deeper into the computational physics
simulations of
planetary atmospheres you will need a PhD in something highly
numerate.


er no, all you have to do is be a raliway engineer, or a third rate
natural scientist from a 4th rate university.

Or a politicain or a green activist.

You are talking utter nonsense.

You are aware that the chairman of the IPCC is a railway engineer, aren't
you?

Yes, I'm still not sure how relevant any railway engineer is, whether
the chairman of IPCC or otherwise, has to do with computer modelling of
climate change. I would agree with Martin that the originator of any
climate model would have a PhD or at least be on the route to obtaining
one.

its not hard to get a Phd in Climate science: you simply lay your hand
on a tree and repeat "I believe in cataatrophic man made global warming,
the logical inviolability of the precautionary princple, and hereby
denounce all opposition as holocaust deniers"



--
Ineptocracy

(in-ep-toc-ra-cy) €“ a system of government where the least capable to
lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the
members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are
rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a
diminishing number of producers.