Leon wrote:


"J. Clarke" wrote in message
...
Leon wrote:

I'm not sure that that counts as "didn't get their hand cut off".

Well, in the theme of your comment, Please identify one individual who
didn't get their hand cut off because the Sawstop worked. I think we all
know that you were wanting to know of some one that was not using a
substitute for real human flesh to trigger the stop.

Maybe you know that, but I know no such thing. For someone to "not get his
hand cut off" there must be someone who was at risk of getting his hand cut
off. I want to know who that was. If you can't identify someone then you
should not be claiming that such a person exists.

The hand actually
was not cut off during the demonstration with a real human flesh.

I'm sorry, but I don't see what that has to do with anything.

If the thing had not triggered would he have really contined to feed his
whole
hand through the saw?

Do you not have the intuition to answer that your self?

If he was not in danger of getting his hand cut off then sawstop did not
"save him from getting his hand cut off". So was he in fact in such
danger?

And would it have prevented someone who really wanted to cut his hand off
from doing so? Note that the saws they are looking to sell have a defeat
switch.

And again I answer with a the question, Do you not have the intuition to
answer that your self?

You're the one who used someone deliberately sticking his hand in the saw as
an example of someone "not getting his hand cut off".

--
--John
Reply to jclarke at ae tee tee global dot net
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)