On 19/09/13 22:25, Terry Fields wrote:
It seems to be a general tactic of those on shaky ground whereby they
accuse others of the very things they do themselves. Hence, I can see
this is going to be a long job.
I thnk yuou need to know that AGW was designed from the ground up as one
huge BIg Lie.

Ther is no pont in telling its proponents its false: they know that
already. They are simply using words, ides, memes - anything that comes
to hand up and including threats bribes and blackamial to saturate the
media with one on message meme. Even wikipedia is saturated. They
command nearly all the communitcations chanbels, because the whole idea
is to make a lot of money out of gullible greens and plebby voters by
creating massive market momentum for anything 'green', gettng it
legislated into a de jure monopoly, and cleaning up.

its got nothing to do with science, or cliamate change, and java jive
knows this perfectly well.

He is not interested in the truth,. merely in preserving the illusions
that 'everybody believes in AGW' and 'anyone who doesn't is a Nazi
concentration camp guard with his hand on the gas tap'

Ad hominens, Big Lies, FUD, the precautionary principle, appeal to
authority, appeal to morality, peer group pressure, circular logic,
anecdotal evidence, spin, blackmail, these swine haven't missed a
single trick.

It is, when all is said and done, a complete tissue of lies.

Long gone are the times when you felt these protagonists were merely
deluded, and in denial. It is now absolutely clear that they are nothing
of the kind: They are fighting a war to save their faces, their careers,
and their jobs, and their profits and there is no farthing so low they
won't stoop to pick it up. And nothing they won't stoop to in terms of
dsihonourable tacticsm, deceptions lies and evasions.

The big green spin machine has had a good run, and they have bilked us
for trillions.

Because we were too busy to examine their arguments in detail.

But the truth can't remain hidden forever,

--
Ineptocracy

(in-ep-toc-ra-cy) €“ a system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers.