On Sat, 14 Sep 2013 19:54:37 +0100, "dennis@home"
wrote:
On 14/09/2013 19:22, Java Jive wrote:
On 14 Sep 2013 16:19:18 GMT, Terry Fields
wrote:
Java Jive wrote:
On Sat, 14 Sep 2013 12:14:35 +0100, "dennis@home"
wrote:
The BBC is totally biased.
It is certainly less biased than you, for example.
For a broadcaster with a remit to maintain balance, it is totally
biased on the topic having taken a policy decision to do so.
It has taken a policy decision based on the best scientific evidence
available, one which agrees with the general understanding and
agreement of the vast majority of scientists. I no more expect them
to give credence to denialists such as yourself any more than I expect
them to give latter day druids credence.
That's good as the BBC has over half a million hits on druids.
It also has over 14,000 on climate change. Your point is?
It refuses to act as any real scientist does and debate for and against
for climate change.
Because the real science has now moved beyond that.
The real science is still trying to make a model that works
The imperfections of the various models do not of themselves imply
that climate change is not happening. It merely implies that we can
not yet model it accurately enough to be very useful.
and still
gives the answer they want rather than the answer they keep getting.
Again, I note that you give no link in support of this claim.
So you don't accept GW caused by man made CO2 then!?
I accept AGW completely.
Using an unreliable mathematical model as proof is not using
overwhelming evidence, in fact its not evidence at all.
Again, you are arguing from the particular to the general. However
much you'd like it to, the fact that the modelling in particular is
not yet very useful doesn't mean that all the other general evidence
of AGW somehow magically becomes invalid.
--
================================================== =======
Please always reply to ng as the email in this post's
header does not exist. Or use a contact address at:
http://www.macfh.co.uk/JavaJive/JavaJive.html
http://www.macfh.co.uk/Macfarlane/Macfarlane.html