On Wed, 04 Sep 2013 20:12:40 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:

On 04/09/13 20:00, harryagain wrote:
"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message
...

Full of sh*t as usual.
Three hundred tons a day (atleast)of radioactive water is leaking from the
site.
http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-23779561

at most 300 tins IN ALL has leaked.

That's actually correct, for once, but it's quite bad enough.

The true cost of nuclear power.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/...ly-500-million
-as-tepco-deals-with-water-crisis/2013/09/03/581876c6-147c-11e3-880b-7503237cc69d_story.html

washingtn post is like the new ytorsk times, hardly unbiased.

Whereas you are UNBIASED????? Everyone in this ng KNOWS that you have
a pro-nuclear bias, but perhaps not everyone quite realised just how
badly it affects your judgement until you were stupid enough to start
a pro-nuclear thread in the middle of the leak crisis at Fukushima.
Talk about moronically bad timing - no wonder all the **** is flying
in your direction!

Taxpayer picks up the bill as usual with nuclear power.

Exactly.

because governbment insists on making it stupidly expensive.

Noone has MAKE it expensive, when you work out the true cost of it, it
just is.
--
================================================== =======
Please always reply to ng as the email in this post's
header does not exist. Or use a contact address at:
http://www.macfh.co.uk/JavaJive/JavaJive.html
http://www.macfh.co.uk/Macfarlane/Macfarlane.html