On Fri, 16 Aug 2013 10:35:40 -0400, Martin Riddle
wrote:
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 11:00:21 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:
See attachment.
...Jim Thompson
I see some distortion in #2 so #3 must be "improved" 
Cheers
Nope, just the opposite.
Input was 40.1kHz square wave, 0.25% off of design center. Delay
measured at zero crossing (with a Probe cursor so I could get a
numerical read-out)... 178ns (improved), 236ns (normal), 10ns time
step.
"Cute" idea, but non-productive.
Larkin will now claim that whatever I did, to translate his idea to
40kHz, was not what he meant.
But he'll not ever demonstrate what he meant... at least in a fashion
that can be independently verified.
'Tis a shame that we can't actually have _critical_ discussions of
design ideas here :-(
...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson | mens |
| Analog Innovations | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| San Tan Valley, AZ 85142 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice
480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at
http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.