On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 12:43:33 GMT, (Doug Miller)
vaguely proposed a theory
.......and in reply I say!:

I did not NEED to snip the "offensive" (in the truest sense of the
word) part. It was missing. If you find the words offensive that's
your problem.....get off the net. **** happens here!

The content of the message, sans any of the usual url or attachment,
was the whole _point_ of my reply.

My "offenc(iv)e is against the intent of these posts, which for the
time being aim at sexual stuff, but cause viruses and worms on your
system.

Since you had to _read_ the contents of my post to see the text, who's
the idiot? I read headers (it's called a "thinking ahead job" in Net
parlance) only and worry about the content if I am stupid enough to
read it. If you can't mentally filter out "shower scene" in a tech
forum, then ......

In my messianic fervour, I feel that stopping these arseholes with
their nasty little viruses and spams is more important than not
offending the odd ball who wants to pick a fight rather than think for
themselves once in a while.

In article , Old Nick wrote:


Didn't even have the brains to attach or post the URL....eeeeeeeegh!

I see _you_ didn't have the brains to snip the offensive material from your
followup.

My filters dropped the original post, but thanks to you, the followup came
through. Idiot.