Nightjar wrote:
[snip]

I suspect that Lego is registered for games and playthings and probably
anything else they can actually justify by use but not for building
materials, unless they have a construction industry arm I haven't heard
of. If so, the building materials company could even have called their
product Lego without infringing the trade name.

Well yes but it doesn't always work that way. As witness Virgin Windows and
Virgin computers. Branson doesn't sell either but his company successfully
sued both businesses.

And my computer graphics had no relationship to childrens' toys.

--
€¢DarWin|
_/ _/