On 23/07/13 21:32, John Williamson wrote:
Tim Streater wrote:
In article ,
"harryagain" wrote:

"Tim Streater" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"harryagain" wrote:

"Nightjar" wrote in message
...
On 22/07/2013 18:45, harryagain wrote:

...
And we are all going to have to use less...

Why on earth should I have to, just to satisfy a few vocal
'greens' who can't understand that nuclear power is the
greenest option.

We can't even dispose of the nuclear waste we've got, ...

You keep telling lies about this harry, is there any reason for that?

If we could do it, it would have been done.

It has been done harry - for 20 years or so. There is old waste that
has not been treated, leftover from the bomb programme. That waste
will need to be treated eventually, and it will probably be
expensive. But that is the case whether or not we build new reactors.
Waste from reactors however is routinely treated.

You know all this as you have been told it a number of times. So why
do you keep lying about it?

Because the worry about whether his solar panels will still work
tomorrow, and whether they will have charged his car up so he can go
shopping has addled his brain.

What brain? he just reads it all off green**** and the Gordian.


--
Ineptocracy

(in-ep-toc-ra-cy) €“ a system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers.