On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 19:15:40 +0100, "harryagain"
wrote:


"Oren" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 23:11:30 -0700 (PDT), harry
wrote:

On Jun 17, 1:32 am, Oren wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 20:17:01 -0400, wrote:
Yes, development in Africa is a vairy difficult subject - if it
wasn't, not everybody who has tried in the past would have failed as
dismally as they have - but progress is being made - one step at a
time.

I think, along the Congo, natives regretted not killing Livingstone
& Stanley ?

Since Livingstone never traveled on the Congo they wouldn't have had
the chance.

His was at the headwaters of the Congo.

But then you always come up with fiction.

Stanley was an American who spent time shooting negros, in Africa
sport he was no doubt accustomed to.

Stanley was not an American. He was born in Wales, died in London.

So. A British explorer "who spent time shooting negros, in Africa
sport he was no doubt accustomed to."

"But then you always come up with fiction."

American enough to fight in the civil war.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_M...ry.2C_new_name

As American as Arnie.


Idiot! Many people fought in the Civil War, that were not Americans.
Not ONLY was he a redcoat devil, he became a "Galvanized Yankee"!

So it was Stanley (British) that you claimed was an American
"shooting" Negroes for "sport". A blatant lie that he was American.

You need a mental evaluation.