On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 23:35:57 -0700 (PDT), harry
wrote:

On Jun 17, 4:54*pm, Oren wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 23:11:30 -0700 (PDT), harry

wrote:
On Jun 17, 1:32*am, Oren wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 20:17:01 -0400, wrote:
Yes, development in Africa is a vairy difficult subject - if it
wasn't, not everybody who has tried in the past would have failed as
dismally as they have - but progress is being made - one step at a
time.

I think, along the Congo, natives regretted *not killing *Livingstone
& Stanley ?

Since Livingstone never traveled on the Congo they wouldn't have had
the chance.

His was at the headwaters of the Congo.

But then you always come up with fiction.

Stanley was an American who spent time shooting negros, in Africa
sport he was no doubt accustomed to.

Stanley was not an American. He was born in Wales, died in London.


By that measure there are no Americans except the indians.
The ones left that is after the various massacres.
Still the VAST majority of Americans were born on American soil - of
parents born on American soil, who died on American soil - and they
themselves will die on American soil. A very large percentage having
never set foot OFF of American soil - so yes, the RE American.