On 11/06/2013 01:56, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 10/06/13 22:21, dennis@home wrote:
On 10/06/2013 09:34, Tim Streater wrote:

You're just rationalising, harry. Subsidised theft is still theft,
whichever way you slice it.


Careful you are acusing TNP's FIL of being a thief.
No. his panels are water heating. He was promised 'halving the heating
bills' In fact he spent MORE on heating.. the fine print said 'halve
tour hot *water* bills' which I pointed out to him.

He chose to believe the SPIV harry clone.

getting the panels cleaned and serviced cost more than he saved in the
whole year.

Money down the drain.



He's not going to claim the RHI then?