On 01/06/2013 12:42, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 01/06/13 07:04, harry wrote:
On Jun 1, 3:30 am, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:
On 31/05/13 23:32, Farmer Giles wrote:







On 31/05/2013 23:08, Tim Streater wrote:
In article ,
The Natural Philosopher wrote:
http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/RS...tweigh_Fukushi...

ion_risk_3105131.html
And in the 1600s it was witches. I imagine harry would have ben there
with the best of them, lighting the logs under the "witch" because she
floated when they dunked her.
One thing we can always rely on with the nuclear lobby is their
ability to tell lies, and I bet the next one will be to tell us you've
solved the problem of what to do with the increasing amount of nuclear
waste.
Unless, that is, you try the even bigger lie that there is no problem.
Of course if you start from bigotry, everything proves the case. No one
died after Chernobyl? Obviously its being covered up...

You are a lying toad TurNiP' Full of ****. Are you in the pay of
someone?
Thirty one people died shorty after the disaster and many more will
die.

78 people have died. Thatsit. over 100,000 were preduicted/.

http:

The same people who write global warmning ****e in wiki write anti
nuclear ****e.

Show me the hundred thousand corpses harry.

The final chernobyl death toll is 78 confirmed deaths from radiation.
Mostly firefighters.
The AVERAGE radiation level in Pripyat is similar to Dartmoor.
As usual the disaster was not reported it was covered up.

oh harry can i sell you a tinfoil hat?

Even the russians cant cover up 100,000 + deaths spread out across NW
Europe.


Evacuation did not start until 36 hours after the disaster.
(Ha Ha As if they thought they could deny it! But it was the
instinctive response of the nuclear industry. Denial),
It was detected in Sweden first, they thought they had a leak in
their own reactors

And that's why 3000 non fatal thyroid cancers were caused. No iodine
pills and no temporary evacuation. However I-131 is gone in weeks.





J Cancer Epidemiol. 2013;2013:965212. doi: 10.1155/2013/965212. Epub
2013 May 7.

Worldwide increasing incidence of thyroid cancer: update on epidemiology
and risk factors.

Pellegriti G, Frasca F, Regalbuto C, Squatrito S, Vigneri R.

Endocrinology, Garibaldi-Nesima Hospital, Via Palermo, 636, 95122
Catania, Italy.

Abstract

Background. In the last decades, thyroid cancer incidence has
continuously and sharply increased all over the world. This review
analyzes the possible reasons of this increase. Summary. Many experts
believe that the increased incidence of thyroid cancer is apparent,
because of the increased detection of small cancers in the preclinical
stage. However, a true increase is also possible, as suggested by the
observation that large tumors have also increased and gender differences
and birth cohort effects are present. Moreover, thyroid cancer
mortality, in spite of earlier diagnosis and better treatment, has not
decreased but is rather increasing. Therefore, some environmental
carcinogens in the industrialized lifestyle may have specifically
affected the thyroid. Among potential carcinogens, the increased
exposure to medical radiations is the most likely risk factor. Other
factors specific for the thyroid like increased iodine intake and
increased prevalence of chronic autoimmune thyroiditis cannot be
excluded, while other factors like the increasing prevalence of obesity
are not specific for the thyroid.

Conclusions. The increased incidence of thyroid cancer is most likely
due to a combination of an apparent increase due to more sensitive
diagnostic procedures and of a true increase, a possible consequence of
increased population exposure to radiation and to other still
unrecognized carcinogens.

PMID: 23737785


So "they" still cannot ascribe increases to general radiation with any
certainty. And other sources of electricity might actually being more
dangerous.

--
Rod