On Jun 2, 10:50*pm, Mitchell Holman nomailverizon.net wrote:
(Jason) wrote :





In article , Free Lunch
wrote:

On Sun, 2 Jun 2013 07:11:45 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote in alt.atheism:

On Jun 2, 9:43*am, Free Lunch wrote:
On Sun, 02 Jun 2013 08:07:36 -0500, Mitchell Holman
nomailverizon.net wrote in alt.atheism:

"Attila Iskander" wrote in
:

"Tom McDonald" wrote in message
...
On 6/1/2013 8:25 PM, Jason wrote:
In article , "Attila Iskander"
wrote:

What civil right abuse was there ?
Are you claiming that the Feds capturing and deporting
illegal immigrants is
a "civil right violation"
Or are you claiming that if a State captures them and hands
them over to the
Feds is a civil rights violation ?

No. Racial profiling based on nothing more than what someone
'looks like they might be' is a civil rights violation.

What profiling are you babbling about ?
* * The one where close to the Mexico Border, you don't look
for * * Innuit ?

* *My son in law is a transplanted Scot, will
Shreriff Joe lock him up and hold him to run his
own form of "immigration status investigation"?

For the son of Italian immigrants, Arpaio has taken to nativist
bigotry pretty quickly. Of course he assumes that all people of
Northern European heritage are here legally so your son-in-law
would be safe even if he were an illegal immigrant.- Hide quoted
text -

- Show quoted text -

Arresting illegal aliens is not bigotry. *What is in fact bigotted
is your implying that an Italian-American enforcing immigration
law makes him racist.

I'm noting that he is a man who has no understanding of history.

The court case showed that he was racist and bigoted and that he was
engaging in illegal actions in the way he enforced the law.

The supreme court said it was OK for his officers to check the
immigration status of people they pull over for committing traffic
violations or other types of law violations.

* * They cannot jail them just for suspicion of illegal entry.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Who ever claimed that they ever intended to do that? Just you libs,
who didn't even read the law. Geeez