DIYbanter - View Single Post

Free Lunch

On Sun, 02 Jun 2013 15:01:23 -0700, (Jason) wrote in
alt.atheism:

In article , Free Lunch
wrote:

On Sun, 02 Jun 2013 08:07:36 -0500, Mitchell Holman nomailverizon.net
wrote in alt.atheism:

"Attila Iskander" wrote in
:

"Tom McDonald" wrote in message
...
On 6/1/2013 8:25 PM, Jason wrote:
In article , "Attila Iskander"
wrote:

What civil right abuse was there ?
Are you claiming that the Feds capturing and deporting illegal
immigrants is
a "civil right violation"
Or are you claiming that if a State captures them and hands them
over to the
Feds is a civil rights violation ?

No. Racial profiling based on nothing more than what someone 'looks
like they might be' is a civil rights violation.

What profiling are you babbling about ?
The one where close to the Mexico Border, you don't look for
Innuit ?

My son in law is a transplanted Scot, will
Shreriff Joe lock him up and hold him to run his
own form of "immigration status investigation"?

For the son of Italian immigrants, Arpaio has taken to nativist bigotry
pretty quickly. Of course he assumes that all people of Northern
European heritage are here legally so your son-in-law would be safe even
if he were an illegal immigrant.

You are missing the point. Let's say a cop pulls over a speeder or someone
that ran a red light. Let's say the driver is a Latino. The cop would ask
him for his driver's license and his green card. If the green card info.
checks out, he would not have to be concerned about being sent back to
Mexico. He may get a ticket for speeding or running a red light.

Except that American citizens have no duty to carry papers. Police don't
have the right to ask you every day to show that you are a citizen.

On the other hand, if the Latino does NOT have a green card, he could be
arrested and border patrol agents would be notified to pick him up since
he was not an American citizen and did not have a green card.

The Supreme Court stated it was OK for cops to do it. Don't you support
Supreme Court decisions?