On Fri, 31 May 2013 13:15:05 -0400
wrote:
On Thu, 30 May 2013 10:44:33 -0700, "Fidem Turbare, the non-existent
atheist goddess" wrote:
On Thu, 30 May 2013 12:54:33 -0400
wrote:
On Thu, 30 May 2013 00:39:04 -0700, "Fidem Turbare, the
non-existent atheist goddess" wrote:
On Wed, 29 May 2013 21:06:38 -0400
wrote:
On Tue, 28 May 2013 16:47:29 -0700, "Fidem Turbare, the
non-existent atheist goddess" wrote:
On Tue, 28 May 2013 11:18:31 -0400
wrote:
On Sat, 25 May 2013 16:48:00 -0700, Fidem Turb?re, the
non-existent atheist goddess
wrote:
On Sat, 25 May 2013 09:33:27 -0400
wrote:
On Fri, 24 May 2013 20:05:00 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
wrote:
In article ,
Alfred E. Newman wrote:
On Thu, 23 May 2013 21:36:09 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
wrote:
In article
,
Mitchell Holman nomailverizon.net wrote:

Boy Scouts vote to lift ban on gay youth
May 23 2013

GRAPEVINE, Texas -- The Boy Scouts of America voted
Thursday to end its controversial policy banning
gay kids and teens from joining one of the nation's
most popular youth organizations, ditching
membership guidelines that had roiled the group in
recent years. Over 61 percent of Scouting's
National Council of 1,400 delegates from across the
country voted to lift the ban, BSA officials said.
The final tally was 757 yes votes, to 475 no.

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013...couts-vote-to-
lift-ban-on-gay-youth?lite

It's about ****ing time!

Next step is to allow atheists. Until that day, the
Boy Scouts are still a bigoted organization.

--

JD

Jeanne, why do you say they are still bigoted? Is it
because you weren't allowed to join because of what you
have between your legs? Or was it because of what you
don't have between your ears?

I had the Girl Scouts available to me. A FAR better
organization than the Boy Scouts.

Nonsense. If that's true, why are so many girls trying to
get into Boy Scouts? Boy Scouts has a much larger and
stronger organization, with more programs, camps, and
outings.

If girls really were trying to get into the Boy Scouts,

They are.

Can you prove that?

they'd most
likely be Catholic Girls coveting some new "experiences."
If their motives were purely to become Scouts, then your
suggestion seems ludicrous because there's another very
similar organization which is famously known as "Girl
Scouts."

A poor imitation. But do pay attention (I know you're
stupid, but try). That's what the thread is about.

Your fallacious ad hominem attack doesn't help your position.

Even after having it explained to you, you're to stupid to get
it and think you have to repeat yourself. What a dumb****!

Your fallacious ad hominem attack, which includes a spelling
error, doesn't help your credibility.

With regard to the Boy Scouts being a "stronger
organization," that's just a reflection of the behaviour
exhibited by those who feel threatened by homosexuality
(even though a person's private sexual encounters really
are none of their business).

Idiot.

Your unsubstantiated ad hominem attack doesn't help your
position.

See above, dumb****.

Ditto.

Completely irrelevant and wrong (but that's to be expected).

It is relevant because a fear of homosexuality has been a
serious hinderance to the reputation of the Boy Scouts as an
organization.

There is no fear, dumb****.

It appears that 39% of the Boy Scouts might be homophobic.

The fear is in your remaining neuron, which is obviously getting
quite lonely.

What part of the concept of "non-existence" is it that's most
troubling for you?

Additionally, I contend that I am correct with regards to a
person's private sexual encounters being a matter that doesn't
concern the Boy Scouts, and I disagree with you that the
inverse is expected.

It never did. Only their public actions.

What public actions? Were they publicly engaging in sexual
intercourse while also representing the Boy Scouts? If not, then
it shouldn't be an issue for the Boy Scouts as an organization.

You really are stupid!

Your fallacious ad hominem attack doesn't help your argument.

Sadly, our troop leader was a bitch who favored her
daughter and her buddies over the rest of the troop, so
I dropped out as soon as I was allowed.

You learned well.

That's not a matter of learning, rather it's a matter of
exercising judgement based on values of fairness.

Being a bitch? You should know. You're hers.

Your fallacious ad hominem attack confirms that you feel
threatened and angered, most likely because you know that
you're wrong. If you didn't feel intimidated by your error,
the need to respond ad hominem would be non-existent (that
last word is meaningful to me).

Not at all "fallacious" (you must have had mommy look that one
up for you). You really are her bitch, dumb****.

Can you substantiate your claim that I have a mommy and that she
looked up the word "fallacious" for me?

Your use of profanities to express your anger and frustration when
presenting fallacious assertions doesn't help your argument.

Do you feel intimidated when other people exercise judgement
based on values of fairness because it's not consistent with
the various religious delusions that many people suffer from?

Once again you show exactly how self-important you lefty loons
are.

I did not claim to be important, and your fallacious ad hominem
attacks don't help your argument.

I bet your only grade is school was "present". What a dumb****.

Your implicit offer to engage in gambling is not accepted because
your fallacious ad hominem attack that follows in the next
sentence fails to add meaningful value to this social intercourse
we're engaging in.

Proving again what an absolute dumb**** you are.

You tried to start a bet, that's gambling, so your proof is refuted.

Showing once again your lack of reading skills. What an arrogant
dummy. Lefties always are.

Your fallacious ad hominemistic conclusions indicate that you are
acutely aware that you have failed to prove your claims.

--
Fidem Turbāre, the non-existent atheist goddess
"It is sort of a text-based 'Space Invaders.'"
-- Don Martin (May 25, 2013; a reason for debating theists)